Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Pittburgh Penguins Birthday Invitations

Hääää? Inception Inception or the Second






Twice I've seen this movie so far. I was totally random after the first time, I have after the to say the second time the luxury indulged in: girls who you have to understand it. Interpret simply bissl. And after hours of searching the Internet I come to the conclusion that it probably all do who have seen the film.
recently was in "Die Presse" to read that scientists have discovered what makes a successful blockbuster: Demach, a film 30% action, 17% Humor, 13% good versus evil, 12% love and romance, 10% Special Effects, 10% plot and 8% mentioned music to zuwerden a hit movie. Well, yes.

Action has Inception enough. Almost too much. Good versus evil is, in fact Inception: Di Caprio, and wake to the personified defenses of the brain that is designed to prevent you Di Caprio in the brain and sits up in confusion. Sunday and the man has a variety of brain-Security. But certainly also a mesh, cart to as many people to the movies by uses both the action film and the drama. But when I have so few sequences only shot, probably explain the 8% to act by itself goes some places, just keep nothing. Too bad. I would
the film quite as successful, sophisticated and intelligent call. And yet, even with this concoction is not the superficial. Nolan puts together an ensemble of actors, of which only max. 3 are described in more detail. DiCaprio plays the lead role Cobb, he ist der Anführer seines Teams, eigentlich ein Profi seines Fachs, der nur das Problem hat, dass seine verstorbene Frau Mal (Marion Cottilard) immer mal wieder seine Traum-Arbeit stört, indem sie irgendwen abknallt und somit das Projekt des Gatten gänzlich ruiniert. Die einzige, die Cobbs Psychose durchschaut, ist eine junge Studentin (Puppengesicht Ellen Page) Ariadne, (sehr nette Anspielung, bedenkt man doch, dass das Mädl dauernd Probleme mit Labyrinthen hat!), die als Traum-Architektin angeheuert wird.

Die anderen Charaktere bleiben blass. Da gibt es noch den Adel Tawil Verschnitt (Dileep Rao), der die Substanz mixen muss, damit man 10h träumen kann, den Fälscher(Tom Hardy), der darauf specialized, is to take another form, in this film, but distinguished by the fact that he constantly pushes stupid comments and use most any weapon, Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), which is known for 150 minutes not know who he really is, I suppose he is Cobbs trainee, Ken Watanabe as client and the Batman remains Cillian Murphy as a rich entrepreneur Bubi and the superb Michael Caine as a mysterious father of Cobb. Humor and romance is found in this film barely.

The soundtrack sounds like a stripped-Best Of album by Hans Zimmer, the film would be lost without music. The beginning sounds like The Dark Knight, the center to the Da Vinci Code at the end you can hear a hint of Pearl Harbor in Room devotional drums and string music.
For a layman like me, the special effects are used well and made credible. According to the actor, has been rejected in various scenes to a blue box and instead used new camera techniques to make passages more realistic.
For those who are just as haphazard and seek to answer questions that probably can not even answer Nolan, this link is recommended. May bring some light into the darkness
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Inception-Explained-Unraveling-The-Dream-Within-The-Dream-19615.html

Since it is difficult to write about the film, with nothing to tell, I would like to add enclosed my current interpretation. So who has not seen the film should at least now stop reading.

___________
When I left the cinema after seeing the first time, I was haphazard. Days, I racked my head as I could interpret the ending, which heralds a turning point scene. I talked with some people who have seen the movie and I was usually put off with the simple answer: The movie has an open end, you do not know ultimately dreams whether Cobb or not because his totem the roundabout at the end just before the fade Although further rotates but starts to stumble. If somehow the fun of a further thought such a response. So I watched the movie a second time before I searched the internet for possible interpretations. It is recommended to really see this film twice. Not that it would be great wiser afterwards, but you get more dialogue, which I see as important.
Two things can be regarded as a real fix: Cobb's wife killed herself, all linked him to her death, so he is not allowed to see his children. The latter is his big goal. He would like to return to the U.S. to his children.
The fact that the film with the slogan adorns dream, fits in my opinion, see, after two, not more. All parties can only dream of using a sedative, followed by a long stupor. That leaves the question of whether dreams really drugged, or some kind of drug intoxication experience, because the brain reacts to the substance administered. But of course, is not well in prudish America to say, look how great things happen during a drug rush.
for me was a scene of great importance in order to manifest my current interpretation. A scene that one can see after a notice is not large: Arthur gets to teach the task of Ariadne, as it can build dreams. He teaches an infinite Treppe- ein Paradoxon- zu kreieren. Danach spricht sie ihn auf Cobbs Frau an und er meint: Sie war wunderbar. Den ganzen Film über gibt es eine Begegnung zwischen Arthur und Mal. Gleich zu Beginn des Films schießt sie ihm ins Knie, um ihn letztendlich ganz zu töten und so zum Aufwachen zu zwingen. Würden Sie, lieber Leser, so eine Furie als wunderbar bezeichnen? Wohl kaum. Arthur gibt also an Mal zu kennen, was jedoch unmöglich scheint, trat er ja erst in den Dienst von Cobb ,als dessen Frau schon lange tot war. Bis auf Ariadne weiß auch niemand aus dem Team, dass Cobb noch immer mit der Projektion seiner toten Frau zu kämpfen hat. Wenn man den Film nicht als großartiges Ensemblespiel sieht, sondern Di Caprios Part heraushebt, dann It is also his story. The order to implant the wealthy business heir to a thought only the subplot. When you see the action so from a psychological standpoint, the film is the journey of Cobb in his subconscious in order to break away from his wife. Only in limbo, again landing a great allusion to a region of hell where the souls who are excluded through no fault of the sky, he manages to break away from the guilt feelings that plague him, since then, from his wife on their wedding day the window has fallen, because she was mad. Only with a clear conscience he can to his children.
His team I can see why as internal helpers. Sie alle sind Anteile von Cobb selbst, die ihm dabei helfen, Ebene für Ebene tiefer in sein Unterbewusstsein zu dringen. Das würde auch für mich erklären, warum Arthur Mal kennt. Wenn Mal eine innere Erinnerung ist und Arthur ein innerer Gehilfe, so kann ein Wissen vom anderen möglich sein, weil sie letztendlich alle Hirngespinste von Cobb sind.



0 comments:

Post a Comment